“consistent
&
wholesome plans
digested by common counsels,
&
modified by mutual interests”
— Geo.
Washington, 1796,
to the American citizenry
the peril of potentially ending all life on the earth — even the cockroaches — by
nuclear conflagration
We note here the nature of the war-machine system and how it has been both imperiling us and
collapsing our economy for so long.
We may look at details of President John F. Kennedy’s turn from being a Cold Warrior to
someone struggling to prevent America’s national security apparatus and the
military-industrial complex from plunging the world into a catastrophic nuclear holocaust.
Documentation has come to light in recent decades of some noteworthy events that include:
•
Pope John XXIII’s secret diplomacy (in his last dying days) between Nikita Khrushchev
and President Kennedy;
•
during the Cuban missile crisis, Khrushchev reading Anatoliy Dobrynin’s cable stating
that Robert F. Kennedy was telling Dobrynin that President Kennedy expected he could likely be
overthrown by his own US government;
•
the US general staff demanding that Kennedy authorize them to launch a surprise nuclear attack
on Russia in which they would hope to be able to kill at the very least 140,000,000 Russians;
•
the general staff telling Kennedy that they expected that the US would be lucky enough to have
only 30,000,000 Americans killed in the aftermath of such a first strike that they were
insisting was absolutely necessary for them to launch (so as to win the Cold War);
•
discussions showing that the US knew that the Russians had already created a 100-megaton bomb
(5,000 times the destructive power of the bomb dropped on Hiroshima) and that the Russians
were ready to use these if such warfare broke out;
•
the letter that Jackie Kennedy wrote to Khrushchev in her final hours in the White House after
President Kennedy’s murder.
We look back at the history of the nuclear confrontation between America and Russia in the
early 1960s, and we see that at that time, millions of Americans anxiously waited for days,
watching the skies, waiting to see if Russian missiles would appear, bringing their doom.
But as the years and decades have passed, later disclosures and documentation have revealed
that their fears were not really nearly as great as they should have been; the two superpowers
came closer than was realized at the time to destroying each other — and much of the
rest of the world — in nuclear annihilation.
In the long time since, the destructive capabilities of such weaponry are so much more
devastating.
The range at which these weapons can be targeted and the speeds at which they can be propelled
are so great as to be nearly unfathomable.
The numbers of these weapons — and of those who possess and control them — gets
harder to calculate.
The propensity, of those who do control them, to use them, intentionally — or even more
terrifyingly — inadvertently, becomes ever less knowable.
And at the center of this is America, the nation who first created nuclear weaponry, who is
still the only power — the only country or even stateless power — that has ever
used a nuclear weapon against masses of human beings, and who did so multiple times.
Has America (or the rest of the world) learned anything from our past conflicts and
confrontations?
If just one of these weapons were ever to be used, can we guess what the likelihood might be
of all-out war breaking out?
Can we know, in the aftermath of a total nuclear conflagration, whether any form of life at
all would be able to survive on this earth?
Might the earth become completely uninhabitable for even the cockroaches, for even molds or
fungus, for even the simplest of bacteria?
Are Americans truly giving thought to the peril that we are facing?
And if so, what priority are we giving to facing up to what we are facing?
National Political Independence
Convention™,
Inc.,
an independent expenditure-only political committee (super PAC), FEC ID #C00871228,
founded on George Washington’s 292nd birthday, Feb. 22, 2024,
|
to study issues facing our nation and show how presidential and vice presidential
candidates and other concerned citizens in common counsel can devise, develop, and
delineate policy planks, to address these issues, that all interrelate in a cohesive
tapestry to build a policy platform undergirded by empirical scientific and historical
evidence.
|
how
we’re proposing to achieve the goal of this initiative; the Website that describes
why
we’re proposing the initiative; the Website — of this independent
expenditure-only political committee, under the auspices of
whom
the initiative is being undertaken — that describes
what
the goal is;
this initiative
of the independent expenditure-only political committee.
The independent expenditure-only political committee is not authorized by, not controlled
by, and not guided by any other committee, officially authorized campaign, association,
organization, or political party of any kind, nor does it advocate for or endorse or
support any particular candidate or nominee for the presidency or vice presidency or for
any other elected or appointed office.]
|